Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Shamans, Nostalgias, and the IMF: South Korean Popular Religion in Motion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Laurel Kendall is an anthropologist specializing in Korean shamanism, and this academic book, published by University of Hawaii Press, examines how Korean shamanic practice, mudang ritual, has adapted to and been shaped by modern economic and political forces, drawing on Kendall's own long term ethnographic fieldwork with practicing shamans. Its strength is sustained direct ethnographic access across decades, letting Kendall trace real change in the practice over time rather than presenting a single static snapshot. Its limit is that it focuses specifically on the practitioners and communities Kendall worked with in South Korea, and shamanic practice varies across different regional traditions and lineages within Korea, so it should be read as a documented account of the specific practice she studied rather than a universal description of Korean shamanism.

Facts
Citation
Author
Laurel Kendall
Publisher
University of Hawaii Press
Publication Year
2009
URL
https://archive.org/details/shamansnostalgia0000kend
Source Type
Monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Laurel Kendall's academic study, drawing on her own long-term ethnographic fieldwork with practicing Korean shamans, examining how mudang ritual has adapted to modern economic and political forces rather than presenting a single static snapshot.
Notes
Ethnography of Korean mudang practice as a contemporary, changing religion rather than a survival.
Claims Backed By This Source (174 claims)

This source backs 174 claims across the atlas. As facts: 134 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 19 holds, 1 held Differently. Plus 19 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 61 claims: 47 well-attested, 7 holds, 7 general references.
  • Articles, 37 claims: 33 well-attested, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 25 claims: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 3 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 18 claims: 11 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 held Differently, 3 general references.
  • Religions, 12 claims: 11 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Rituals, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Held Differently

1

Religious Roles & Titles

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.