Wilhelm Bleek and Lucy Lloyd were linguists who worked directly with San, called Bushman in the source's own period title, informants in nineteenth century South Africa, and this 1911 volume is their foundational collection and translation of southern African San oral folklore, recorded in the informants' own words with Bleek and Lloyd's linguistic transcription. Its strength is that it preserves oral material directly from San narrators at a time when few others were recording it, giving it lasting value as primary documentation despite its age. Its limit is the colonial-era context of its collection and its now dated terminology, including the source's own period name for its subjects, so a claim about contemporary San communities' own self-understanding needs a more recent source reflecting how San people describe their own culture today.
Facts
Citation
AuthorW. H. I. Bleek and L. C. Lloyd
PublisherGeorge Allen and Company
Publication Year1911
URLhttps://archive.org/details/specimens-of-bushman-folklore-wilhelm-bleek
Source Typeprimary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Bleek and Lloyd's Specimens of Bushman Folklore is the primary published record of their own transcribed testimony, treated at the top tier as that primary ethnographic text itself. NotesBleek and Lloyd's foundational collection and translation of southern African San (Bushman) oral folklore.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Africa directly: "informants in nineteenth century South Africa, and this 1911 volume is their foundational collection and translation of southern African San oral folklore, recorded in the informants' own words with..."
Claims Backed By This Source (35 claims)
This source backs 35 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religions, 5 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Studies, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.