Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo, File Record (Wikimedia Commons, Yoshitoshi)

source

The Wikimedia Commons file record for Tsukioka Yoshitoshi's 1887 triptych "Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo," from Nippon Ryakushi, published by Izawa Genjiro, a physically distinct comparable print read here to corroborate the myth's established place in Japanese woodblock printing, not for facts specific to the Kuniteru work.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
Wikimedia Commons
URL
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Susanoo-no-Mikoto-slays-Yamata-no-Orochi-in-Izumo-By-Tsukioka-Yoshitoshi.png
Source Type
reference-database
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier three: a public domain media file record of a physically distinct but iconographically comparable print, used only to corroborate the myth and its treatment in the print tradition, independent of the MFA Boston-credited work.
Connections

Associated With

Susanoo, Deities

This source names Susanoo directly: "Tsukioka Yoshitoshi's 1887 triptych "Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo," from Nippon Ryakushi, published by Izawa Genjiro, a physically distinct comparable print read here to..."

Source Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo, File Record (Wikimedia Commons, Yoshitoshi)
Susanoo, Figures

This source names Susanoo directly: "Tsukioka Yoshitoshi's 1887 triptych "Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo," from Nippon Ryakushi, published by Izawa Genjiro, a physically distinct comparable print read here to..."

Source Susanoo no Mikoto Slays Yamata-no-Orochi in Izumo, File Record (Wikimedia Commons, Yoshitoshi)
Claims Backed By This Source (7 claims)

This source backs 7 claims across the atlas. As facts: 5 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.