Conor Newman's Tara, published by the Royal Irish Academy in 1997, is the standard archaeological survey of the Hill of Tara in Ireland, the ceremonial complex traditionally associated with the high kingship, based on Newman's own fieldwork. Its strength is that it is a peer-reviewed archaeological survey providing the detailed site record subsequent scholarship on Tara has built from. Its limit is that it is a survey documenting the physical remains rather than a full account of Tara's significance in medieval Irish literary and mythological tradition, so a claim about that literary material needs a source addressing it directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Conor Newman's Tara, published by the Royal Irish Academy in 1997, is the standard peer reviewed archaeological survey of the Hill of Tara built from Newman's own fieldwork, treated at the top tier. NotesArchaeological survey of the Hill of Tara, Ireland.
Citation
AuthorConor Newman
PublisherRoyal Irish Academy
Publication Year1997
Source TypePrimary excavation report
Connections
Associated With
This source names Ireland directly: "survey of the Hill of Tara in Ireland, the ceremonial complex traditionally associated with the high kingship, based on Newman's own fieldwork."
Source Tara: An Archaeological SurveyConor Newman
Tara, Deities This source names Tara directly: "Conor Newman's Tara, published by the Royal Irish Academy in 1997, is the standard archaeological survey of the Hill of Tara in Ireland, the ceremonial complex traditionally associated with the high..."
Source Tara: An Archaeological SurveyConor Newman
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Artifacts & Relics, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Custodians & Museums, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.