Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Catholic Encyclopedia

The Catholic Encyclopedia is a public domain reference completed in 1913, which this atlas states plainly as a real limit: it predates over a century of subsequent Catholic historical scholarship, and a claim resting on current scholarly consensus should not rely on it alone. What has held up well is its documented strength on the history of Latin liturgical books and votive practice, technical historical material less prone to being overtaken by later doctrinal or historiographical shifts than its more contemporary judgments would have been. This atlas also holds a separate record for this encyclopedia's own entry on Joachim Bouvet; the two are the same 1913 editorial voice under different atlas records, and citing both together is one witness, not two independent ones. Use it for the documented history of Latin liturgical books and votive practice specifically; for anything closer to the present day, a current source is needed alongside it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
A public domain reference completed in 1913 that predates over a century of subsequent Catholic historical scholarship, though its documented strength on the history of Latin liturgical books and votive practice has held up well.
Notes
Public domain reference; strong on the history of Latin liturgical books and votive practice; dated on scholarship since 1913.
Citation
Author
Charles George Herbermann et al. (eds.)
Publisher
Robert Appleton Company
Publication Year
1913
URL
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/
Source Type
encyclopedia
Connections

Derived from This

This is one article inside the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia, the same editors and the same year, not a witness independent of that encyclopedia.

Source Joachim Bouvet (Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913)Charles George Herbermann et al. (eds.)
Claims Backed By This Source (473 claims)

This source backs 473 claims across the atlas. As facts: 336 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 40 holds, 5 connected. Plus 87 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scripture Portions, 91 claims: 49 well-attested, 11 holds, 1 connected, 30 general references.
  • Figures, 85 claims: 66 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 13 general references.
  • Articles, 83 claims: 73 well-attested, 4 connected, 6 general references.
  • Rituals, 53 claims: 46 well-attested, 7 general references.
  • Practices, 46 claims: 38 well-attested, 8 general references.
  • Doctrines, 39 claims: 26 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 8 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 29 claims: 18 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Cities, 24 claims: 11 well-attested, 11 holds, 2 general references.
  • Prayers, 8 claims: 5 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Councils and Synods, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Religious Dress & Vestments, 2 claims: 2 general references.
  • Schools of Theology, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

5

Doctrines

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.