Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265-146 BC

Adrian Goldsworthy's The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265-146 BC, published by Cassell in 2000, is a scholarly military and political history of the three Punic Wars by a historian specialising in Roman military history. Its authority rests on Goldsworthy's direct use of the ancient sources, principally Polybius and Livy, and its standing as a widely used account of the period. It is a historical synthesis for a broad readership as well as specialists, so a claim needing fine source critical detail benefits from checking against the ancient sources it draws on directly.

Facts
Citation
Author
Adrian Goldsworthy
Publisher
Cassell
Publication Year
2000
URL
https://search.worldcat.org/title/The-fall-of-Carthage-:-the-Punic-Wars-265-146-BC/oclc/59290332
Source Type
book
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Adrian Goldsworthy's The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265-146 BC, published by Cassell in 2000, is a scholarly military history by a widely published historian of ancient Rome, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Scholarly history of the Punic Wars and the fall of Carthage, 265 to 146 BC.
Connections

Associated With

Carthage, Cities

This source names Carthage directly: "Adrian Goldsworthy's The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265-146 BC, published by Cassell in 2000, is a scholarly military and political history of the three Punic Wars by a historian specialising..."

Source The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265-146 BCAdrian Goldsworthy
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Wars & Conflicts, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.