Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Imitation of Christ

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Imitation of Christ, traditionally attributed to Thomas a Kempis and translated here by Betty I. Knott, is a primary devotional text from the fifteenth century Devotio Moderna movement, one of the most widely read and translated works in Christian history. As the actual text itself, it carries direct authority for what this specific strand of late medieval spirituality taught about humility, inner devotion and detachment from worldly concern. Its authorship is genuinely uncertain within scholarship, with the traditional attribution to Kempis debated against other candidates and against the possibility of composite authorship across the Devotio Moderna community, a manuscript question separate from and not affecting the text's own devotional content and historical influence across both Catholic and later Protestant readerships.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Imitation of Christ, traditionally attributed to Thomas a Kempis and read here in Betty I. Knott's Penguin Classics translation, is a primary fifteenth century devotional text, treated at the top tier as the text itself for what the Devotio Moderna movement taught.
Notes
Widely used modern English translation of the fifteenth century Devotio Moderna devotional classic.
Citation
Author
Attributed to Thomas a Kempis; trans. Betty I. Knott
Publisher
Penguin Classics
Publication Year
1963
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Thomas, Figures

This source names Thomas directly: "of Christ, traditionally attributed to Thomas a Kempis and translated here by Betty I."

Source The Imitation of ChristAttributed to Thomas a Kempis; trans. Betty I. Knott

This source names Thomas a Kempis directly: "of Christ, traditionally attributed to Thomas a Kempis and translated here by Betty I."

Source The Imitation of ChristAttributed to Thomas a Kempis; trans. Betty I. Knott
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Esoteric Texts, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Organizations, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.