Sources
The Ramayana of Valmiki
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
This edition of the Ramayana is a primary text whose own publication year is deliberately left unset here for the text itself, since the epic was composed and expanded over a long, disputed period rather than at one datable moment, a gap this record states rather than assigns a false precision to. Robert Goldman's general editorship situates the translation within documented scholarly debate about that composition history: Goldman himself proposed oral composition around 750 to 500 BCE, with Books 2 through 6 the oldest layer, while Jacobi argued Books 1 and 7 are later additions and Brockington extends the latest stages to around 300 CE, a live scholarly disagreement this record names rather than resolves. Use it for the content of a specific book or passage of the Ramayana as this edition presents it; a claim resting on one specific dating theory needs a dedicated scholarly source addressing that debate.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A primary Sanskrit epic attributed to Valmiki, presented here in Robert Goldman's scholarly edition; the text's own composition history is genuinely disputed among scholars, with Goldman proposing oral composition roughly 750 to 500 BCE and later books argued by others to be still later additions, a disagreement this record states rather than resolves. NotesPublicationYear left NULL for the text itself. Goldman proposed oral composition c. 750-500 BC. Books 2-6 are the oldest; Jacobi argued Books 1 and 7 are later additions, and Brockington extends later stages to c. 300 CE.
Citation
AuthorValmiki (attributed); Robert P. Goldman (general editor)
PublisherPrinceton University Press
The seven-volume Goldman/Sutherland Goldman critical edition (Princeton Library of Asian Translations) already named in the author field here. The composition date of the underlying text stays disputed and unfilled, as intended. Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (154 claims)
This source backs 154 claims across the atlas. As facts: 110 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 15 holds. Plus 28 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scripture Portions, 49 claims: 35 well-attested, 7 holds, 7 general references.
- Figures, 33 claims: 22 well-attested, 4 holds, 7 general references.
- Articles, 19 claims: 19 well-attested.
- Deities, 16 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 general references.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Religious Events, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 general references.
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Scriptures & Texts, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Mythical Creatures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Languages, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Well-attested
110Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
15Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
28Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.