Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Manfred Clauss is a historian of Roman religion, and this academic study, published by Edinburgh University Press, is one of the standard modern treatments of the Mithraic mysteries, working from the archaeological remains of Mithraea, inscriptions and iconography rather than from later esoteric reinterpretations of Mithras. Its particular strength is honesty about the limits of the evidence, since no Mithraic scripture survives, Clauss is explicit about which claims are secure from inscriptions and which are informed reconstruction from imagery and comparison with other mystery cults. That transparency about uncertainty is unusual and valuable. Its limit is the limit of the underlying evidence itself, much about Mithraic ritual and belief remains genuinely unknown and the book does not pretend otherwise.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Manfred Clauss's scholarly survey of the Roman cult of Mithras covering its iconography, temple architecture, initiatory grades and geographic spread, published by Edinburgh University Press; a modern reconstruction from images and inscriptions, since no Mithraic scripture survives.
Notes
Manfred Clauss's scholarly survey of the Roman cult of Mithras, covering its iconography, temple architecture, initiatory grades and geographic spread, drawing on the archaeological and epigraphic evidence. Use for established facts about Mithraic cult practice and material culture; like Beck's study, a modern reconstruction from images and inscriptions rather than a documented creed, since no Mithraic scripture survives.
Citation
Author
Manfred Clauss
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Publication Year
2000
URL
https://archive.org/details/romancultofmithr0000clau
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Mithras, Deities

This source names Mithras directly: "later esoteric reinterpretations of Mithras."

Claims Backed By This Source (87 claims)

This source backs 87 claims across the atlas. As facts: 58 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 1 connected. Plus 16 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 33 claims: 20 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 5 general references.
  • Articles, 12 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Deities, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Subcategories, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Bodies of Water, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.