Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Morton Bloomfield was a scholar of medieval English literature, and this book, though published in 1952 by a university press, remains a standard reference tracing the history of the seven deadly sins as a religious and literary concept from its patristic origins through medieval English writing such as Chaucer and Langland. Its strength is the specificity of that literary and historical focus, showing how a theological list developed and was used by actual medieval writers, rather than treating the sins as a timeless abstract category. Its limit is its age, scholarship on medieval religious concepts has continued since 1952, and later work may refine or complicate points Bloomfield made, so more recent scholarship should be checked for any claim where currency matters.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Morton Bloomfield's standard scholarly history of the sevenfold scheme of capital vices, tracing its Egyptian monastic origin through Gregory the Great's reduction and reordering to its medieval transmission.
Notes
The standard scholarly history of the sevenfold scheme: its Egyptian monastic origin, Gregory the Great's reduction and reordering, and its medieval transmission. Merged from Source 1506: Full title adds "with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature". The standard history of the capital-vice list from the eight thoughts of Evagrius Ponticus through John Cassian to Gregory the Great's reduction to seven, and of its continued movement through the Middle Ages.
Citation
Author
Morton W. Bloomfield
Publisher
Michigan State College Press
Publication Year
1952
URL
https://archive.org/details/sevendeadlysinsi0000bloo
Source Type
Scholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (104 claims)

This source backs 104 claims across the atlas. As facts: 69 well-attested, 12 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 16 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Virtues, 49 claims: 30 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate, 7 holds, 7 general references.
  • Vices, 33 claims: 19 well-attested, 7 scholarly debate, 7 general references.
  • Articles, 10 claims: 10 well-attested.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Categories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sections, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.