The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the Tiruvaymoli, John Carman and Vasudha Narayanan's 1989 study from the University of Chicago Press, is a scholarly translation and study of a Srivaisnava commentary by two established scholars of South Asian religion with direct command of the Tamil source text. Its strength is that direct textual and commentarial command. Its limit is that it focuses on one specific commentary within a much larger devotional literature; broader claims about the Tamil Veda tradition as a whole should draw on wider scholarship as well.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The Tamil Veda, by John Carman and Vasudha Narayanan, published by the University of Chicago Press in 1989, is a scholarly translation and study by two established scholars with direct command of the Tamil source text, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed academic press scholarship. NotesScholarly study and translation of Pillan's commentary on the Tiruvaymoli, University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Citation
AuthorJohn Carman and Vasudha Narayanan
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
Publication Year1989
Source Typeacademic monograph
Connections
Associated With
This source names Chicago directly: "1989 study from the University of Chicago Press, is a scholarly translation and study of a Srivaisnava commentary by two established scholars of South Asian religion with direct command of the Tamil..."
Source The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the TiruvaymoliJohn Carman and Vasudha Narayanan
This source names Tamils directly: "The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the Tiruvaymoli, John Carman and Vasudha Narayanan's 1989 study from the University of Chicago Press, is a scholarly translation and study of a Srivaisnava..."
Source The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the TiruvaymoliJohn Carman and Vasudha Narayanan
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Regions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.