Elaine G. Breslaw is a historian, and this New York University Press book is her academic study of Tituba, the enslaved woman at the center of the Salem witchcraft accusations, focusing specifically on the long disputed question of her actual ethnic and geographic origin. Its strength is archival correction, Breslaw traces how Tituba's origin was persistently misrepresented in later popular and even some scholarly retellings, and builds a documented case for a different origin than the one most commonly repeated, treating the question as a real historical puzzle rather than settled trivia. Its limit is that Breslaw's specific conclusion about Tituba's origin, while the standard scholarly treatment, rests on inference from indirect colonial era records rather than a document that states her origin outright, so it should be presented as the best supported reading rather than an unchallengeable certainty.
Facts
Citation
AuthorElaine G. Breslaw
PublisherNew York University Press
Publication Year1996
URLhttps://archive.org/details/titubareluctantw0000bres
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Elaine Breslaw's New York University Press standard study of Tituba and the question of her origin. NotesThe standard study of Tituba and of the question of her origin.
Connections
Associated With
This source names New York directly: "Breslaw is a historian, and this New York University Press book is her academic study of Tituba, the enslaved woman at the center of the Salem witchcraft accusations, focusing specifically on the..."
Source Tituba, Reluctant Witch of Salem: Devilish Indians and Puritan FantasiesElaine G. Breslaw
Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)
This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected, 3 open question. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 18 claims: 14 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 4 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 2 open question, 1 general references.
- Studies, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 general references.
- States & Territories, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.