Arthur Macdonell's handbook was published as part of the Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie series, and despite its 1897 date it remains the standard descriptive handbook of the individual Vedic gods, including the Adityas, a documented fact about its continued use by later scholars rather than a claim resting on its original publisher. This record states its honest limit plainly: it is a descriptive, not an interpretive or theoretical, handbook, and later scholarship has developed comparative and structural readings of Vedic myth that Macdonell's period predates. Use it for descriptive facts about a specific Vedic deity as this handbook records them; a claim resting on a modern comparative theory of Vedic myth needs a more recent source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Arthur Macdonell's 1897 handbook, still the standard descriptive reference for the individual Vedic gods despite its age, a documented fact about its continued scholarly use rather than a claim resting on its original publisher. NotesVolume III.1A of the Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde. Still the standard descriptive handbook of the individual Vedic gods, including the Adityas.
Citation
AuthorArthur Anthony Macdonell
PublisherKarl J. Trubner, Strassburg
Publication Year1897
URLhttps://archive.org/details/vedicmythology00macduoft
Source Typeacademic monograph
Connections
Associated With
This source names The Adityas directly: "the individual Vedic gods, including the Adityas, a documented fact about its continued use by later scholars rather than a claim resting on its original publisher."
Source Vedic MythologyArthur Anthony Macdonell
Claims Backed By This Source (484 claims)
This source backs 484 claims across the atlas. As facts: 334 well-attested, 14 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 77 holds, 10 connected. Plus 48 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 323 claims: 196 well-attested, 14 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 76 holds, 36 general references.
- Open Questions, 90 claims: 70 well-attested, 10 connected, 10 general references.
- Articles, 59 claims: 58 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Figures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Well-attested
334Showing 51 to 100 of 108 entities carrying this claim.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.