Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Burney Relief, Encyclopedia Record (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia, "Burney Relief," read 2026-08-18

The Wikipedia article "Burney Relief," describing the Old Babylonian terracotta plaque held at the British Museum under registration 2003,0718.1, dated 1800 to 1750 BCE, with a documented survey of the three competing scholarly identifications of its winged, taloned female figure: Ishtar (the most widely cited reading among independent scholars, argued by Thorkild Jacobsen from the lion and mountain imagery), Ereshkigal (the British Museum's own stated preferred reading, from the hanging wings and originally black background read as underworld imagery), and Lilitu (an early 1936 proposal now largely set aside by modern scholarship). This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
A crowd-edited encyclopedia article, used here for its documented survey of a genuinely disputed identification, reproducing the same registration number, date and material as the museum's own published catalogue text and independently corroborated by a Google Arts and Culture partner page carrying that text.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burney_Relief
Source Type
reference-database
Connections

Associated With

Ereshkigal, Deities

This source names Ereshkigal directly: "from the lion and mountain imagery), Ereshkigal (the British Museum's own stated preferred reading, from the hanging wings and originally black background read as underworld imagery), and Lilitu (an..."

Source Burney Relief, Encyclopedia Record (Wikipedia)
Claims Backed By This Source (7 claims)

This source backs 7 claims across the atlas. As facts: 5 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 connected.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 1 claims: 1 connected.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.