The English Wikipedia article on Antonello da Messina's panel painting Saint Jerome in His Study, oil on limewood, dated to about 1474 to 1475, National Gallery, London, accession NG1418. The article gives the dimensions as 45.7 by 36.2 centimetres, records that the painting belonged to Antonio Pasqualino by 1529 and later to Thomas Baring, first Earl of Northbrook, entering the National Gallery in 1894, and describes Jerome seated barefoot on a cathedra absorbed in reading, within a Gothic architectural study accompanied by a lion, a peacock and a partridge, lit by chiaroscuro effects from the central archway and side windows. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A crowd-edited tertiary reference, used here for its accession number, dimensions and acquisition history, independently corroborated by a separately authored Wikimedia Commons file description for the museum's own photograph of the same panel. Citation
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Jerome_in_His_Study_(Antonello_da_Messina)
Source Typeencyclopedia
Connections
Associated With
This source names Gothic directly: "cathedra absorbed in reading, within a Gothic architectural study accompanied by a lion, a peacock and a partridge, lit by chiaroscuro effects from the central archway and side windows."
Source Saint Jerome in His Study (Wikipedia)
This source names Jerome directly: "da Messina's panel painting Saint Jerome in His Study, oil on limewood, dated to about 1474 to 1475, National Gallery, London, accession NG1418."
Source Saint Jerome in His Study (Wikipedia)
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)
This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 23 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 23 claims: 18 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.