The Wilton Diptych's Wikipedia article is a community-edited encyclopedia entry, covering the portable altarpiece painted circa 1395 to 1399, its unknown English or French artist, its commission for King Richard II, and its present home at the National Gallery, London. Its strength is that these are the kind of stable, documentable commission and provenance facts a general reference handles well. Its limit is that a claim about the specific religious or political symbolism of its imagery needs a source examining that directly, not this general overview. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A Wikipedia article, useful for standard encyclopedic facts about the artwork's dimensions, commission and present location rather than for a contested scholarly claim. NotesEncyclopedic facts for the c. 1395 to 1399 portable altarpiece: its dimensions, its unknown English or French artist, its commission for Richard II, and its present home at the National Gallery, London.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilton_Diptych
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
London, Cities This source names London directly: "present home at the National Gallery, London."
Source Wilton Diptych (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)
This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 31 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 7 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 24 claims: 15 well-attested, 1 open question, 6 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.