Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Atlas Trail

How Western Scholars Opened the Religious Texts of Asia, in Order of Founding

10 stops

These ten disciplines each began when a European or colonial-era scholar learned to read the sacred texts of Asia in their own languages, from the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784 to the first sustained English study of Shinto in 1905. Read in order, they show how reading the originals replaced secondhand summary.

Stop 1 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Founded with the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784, this is the study of the Indian subcontinent's languages, literatures and religions. Its datable textual chronology sits behind what is known of Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh scripture and doctrine.

Stop 2 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Dated from 1786, when William Jones argued in his Third Anniversary Discourse that Sanskrit, Greek and Latin shared a common ancestor. The discipline reads Sanskrit texts through comparative grammar and manuscript collation to find their most plausible original meaning.

Stop 3 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Europe's first dedicated chair, held by Jean Pierre Abel Remusat at the College de France in 1814, marks the start. Confucian, Daoist and Buddhist sources are read directly in classical Chinese rather than through missionary paraphrase.

Stop 4 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Opened by Eugene Burnouf's 1833 analysis of the Yasna. It separates the archaic Gathas attributed to Zoroaster from the linguistically later Younger Avestan material around them.

Stop 5 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Founded on Alexander Csoma de Koros's 1834 grammar and dictionary, built from monastic sources. It lets the Tibetan Buddhist canon be read in classical Tibetan instead of through Mongol or Chinese translation.

Stop 6 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Founded on Eugene Burnouf's 1844 study of manuscripts sent from Nepal. It reads Buddhist canonical texts across Pali, Sanskrit, Tibetan and Chinese and checks them against archaeology and art history.

Stop 7 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Rudolf von Roth argued from 1846 that Vedic Sanskrit and Avestan share an ancestor, and Niels Ludvig Westergaard's Avesta editions made the comparison practical. It shows what Vedic religion and Zoroastrianism inherited in common before they diverged.

Stop 8 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Rests on Max Muller's critical edition of the Rigveda, published between 1849 and 1873. Its internal linguistic chronology shows the Rigveda, the Vedic prose and the Upanishads were composed centuries apart rather than as one text.

Stop 9 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

Georg Buhler used dated inscriptions from Mathura in 1887 to show Jainism was an ancient tradition in its own right, distinct from Buddhism. The field studies Jain scripture and community history through epigraphic and manuscript evidence.

Stop 10 of 10.
Scholarly Disciplines

William George Aston's 1905 Shinto, the Way of the Gods gave the subject its first sustained English language scholarly treatment. The field separates older ritual and shrine practice from the Meiji era state reorganisation.

Download Card

Create an account to keep this trail. Saving copies its stops into a collection of your own, which you can add to, reorder and share.

Where you have got to in this trail is kept by your own browser and is never sent to us. Clearing your browser data clears it. All trails.