Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Indology

Humanities

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1784

The philological and historical study of the Indian subcontinent's languages, literatures and religions, founded with the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784. Supplies the datable textual chronology behind Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh scripture and doctrine.

Facts
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Asian Studies 1
Method
Method
philological study of Sanskrit and other South Asian textual traditions alongside the archaeology and epigraphy of the subcontinent 2
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1784 2
Subject
Subject
the languages, literatures, religions and history of the Indian subcontinent from its earliest textual and material record 2
Learn More
William Jones Founds a Society and Notices a Kinship

Indology is the academic study of the languages, literatures, religions and history of the Indian subcontinent, drawing together Sanskrit and other South Asian philology with the archaeology and epigraphy of the region. Its founding institution is the Asiatic Society of Bengal, established in Calcutta in 1784 by Sir William Jones, a British judge and philologist whose systematic study of Sanskrit led him, two years later, to propose its historical kinship with Greek and Latin, an observation that reshaped the study of language generally and gave the new field of Indology its first working method, comparative philology applied to Sanskrit's enormous textual corpus.

The discipline covers the primary textual foundation for Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh traditions alike, the Vedas, epics, philosophical commentaries and dated inscriptions that let historians establish when a doctrine, practice or textual layer actually entered the tradition's record. Where a living tradition presents a teaching as eternally given, Indological philology and epigraphy frequently supply a datable textual history for the same teaching, and the atlas records both, the tradition's own account and the documented textual chronology, distinguishing one from the other.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.