A civil war between Druze and Maronite Christian communities in Ottoman Mount Lebanon, beginning in May 1860, that widened in July 1860 into a mass killing of Christians in Damascus by a local Muslim mob. Mount Lebanon had been governed since the 1840s by a confessional power-sharing system, the double qaimaqamate, dividing the territory into a Christian and a Druze district; rising tension over land, the silk economy and rival French and British patronage of the two communities broke into open Druze-Maronite fighting that killed thousands, overwhelmingly Christian, and destroyed hundreds of Maronite villages and churches. The violence spread to Damascus in July, where a mob, joined by some irregular fighters and met with little effective resistance from the city's Ottoman governor, attacked the Christian quarter over several days. The exiled Algerian resistance leader Abd al-Qadir al-Jazairi, then living in Damascus, sheltered thousands of Christians in his own residence during the killing, an act still commemorated in Lebanon and Syria today.
Facts
The Event
When It HappenedMay to July 1860, Mount Lebanon fighting followed by the Damascus massacre in July 1 Principal PartiesIn Mount Lebanon, Druze militias against Maronite Christian communities and militias, within the collapsing double qaimaqamate power-sharing system. In Damascus, a local Muslim mob joined by some irregular troops against the city's Christian population, chiefly Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholic rather than Maronite, with the Ottoman provincial governor Ahmad Pasha later held responsible by an international commission of inquiry for failing to prevent or halt the killing. 1 Victim GroupMaronite Christian villagers of Mount Lebanon, killed and driven out as roughly 380 villages and 560 churches were destroyed when a peasant revolt against Druze feudal lords turned confessional, and the Christian population of Damascus, where a Muslim mob killed more than a tenth of the city's Christians in a July 1860 rampage of murder, rape and arson that spread from the Lebanon fighting. 2 Perpetrator RegimeDruze militias carried out the Mount Lebanon killings largely outside Ottoman control; in Damascus a Muslim mob rampaged for days while the Ottoman governor Ahmad Pasha failed to intervene. The Sultan's special delegate Fuad Pasha arrived with troops and an international advisory commission, convened summary tribunals that executed roughly 167 men within three weeks, and had Ahmad Pasha himself court-martialled and shot on 9 September 1860. 2 Consequences
What It SettledEuropean powers, led by France, pressured the Ottoman government into joint action; an international commission of inquiry investigated the killings, and Ottoman authorities executed dozens of officials and participants found responsible, including the Damascus governor's subordinates, and paid reparations to survivors. The double qaimaqamate was abolished in 1861 and replaced by the Mutasarrifate of Mount Lebanon, an autonomous Ottoman province with a Christian governor and European-guaranteed protection for its communities, a settlement that shaped Lebanon's confessional political structure into the twentieth century. 2 Religious DimensionBoth phases of the violence broke along confessional lines and both historians treat the sectarian identity of victims and perpetrators as real rather than incidental: Mount Lebanon's fighting was organized within a governing system, the double qaimaqamate, that was itself confessionally defined, and the Damascus killings targeted Christians specifically as Christians. At the same time, Fawaz argues the Mount Lebanon war cannot be reduced to religious hatred alone, situating it against land tenure change, the silk economy and competing European patronage of the two communities, and Rogan situates the Damascus killing within a wider crisis of Ottoman authority in Syria rather than treating it as a spontaneous religious pogrom alone. Rogan's own characterization of the Damascus events, "a genocidal moment, but not a genocide," reflects that scholarly caution about a single causal story. 1 Status
Official RecognitionNot formally recognized by any body 2 Recognition BasisNo modern international body has retrospectively classified the killings as genocide; the vocabulary and legal mechanism for such a determination postdate 1860 by nearly a century. The Ottoman government's own 1860 commission of inquiry and executions of responsible officials functioned as the era's equivalent accountability process, and Rogan's recent study treats the episode as a precursor case scholars of mass violence now study on its own terms rather than as a fully modern genocide. 2 Disputed
Death TollThe modern scholarly synthesis: Fawaz's archival study puts Mount Lebanon deaths, overwhelmingly Christian with Druze losses far fewer, at roughly seven thousand to eleven thousand; Rogan's more recent Damascus-focused archival reconstruction puts Damascus deaths at roughly five thousand, revising down older claims he does not credit. Combined, this reading gives a low estimate near twelve thousand. Death TollThe upper end of the modern scholarly range, combining Fawaz's higher Mount Lebanon estimate with Rogan's Damascus figure; well below contemporary Western press and missionary claims of the time, some reaching twenty thousand to twenty five thousand for Damascus alone, which Rogan's archival work finds substantially inflated and neither historian relied on here credits. Learn More
Civil War in Mount Lebanon and the Massacre That Followed in Damascus
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Mount Lebanon had been governed since the 1840s under the double qaimaqamate, a power sharing system dividing the territory into a Christian and a Druze administrative district, and rising tension over land, the silk economy and rival French and British patronage of the two communities broke that arrangement into open Druze-Maronite fighting in May 1860. The fighting killed thousands, overwhelmingly Christian, and destroyed hundreds of Maronite villages and churches before it spread to Damascus in July, where a local Muslim mob, joined by some irregular fighters and met with little effective resistance from the city's Ottoman governor, attacked the city's Christian quarter over several days.
Amid the Damascus killing, the exiled Algerian resistance leader Abd al-Qadir al-Jazairi, then living in the city, sheltered thousands of Christians inside his own residence, an act of protection still commemorated in Lebanon and Syria today. Damascus's Christian victims were chiefly Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholic residents rather than Maronites, a distinct community from the one under attack in the mountains, evidence that the summer's violence, though confessionally patterned throughout, was not a single uniform conflict wearing two names.
Accountability After 1860 and a New Confessional Order
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
European powers, led by France, pressured the Ottoman government into joint action once news of the killings spread, and an international commission of inquiry investigated both the Mount Lebanon fighting and the Damascus massacre. Ottoman authorities executed dozens of officials and participants found responsible, including subordinates of the Damascus governor, and paid reparations to survivors, an accountability process historian Eugene Rogan treats as the functional equivalent, for its era, of a modern war crimes tribunal.
The settlement remade Mount Lebanon's government outright: the double qaimaqamate was abolished in 1861 and replaced by the Mutasarrifate of Mount Lebanon, an autonomous Ottoman province governed by a Christian appointee under European guarantee, a confessional political structure that shaped Lebanese governance into the twentieth century. Rogan's own verdict on the killings, a genocidal moment but not a genocide, captures the caution both he and fellow historian Leila Fawaz bring to the episode: real sectarian violence, organized along confessional lines and driven partly by confessional identity itself, but neither reducible to religious hatred alone nor comparable in intent or organization to a twentieth century genocide.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Islam, Religions The Damascus killings were carried out by a local Muslim mob, joined by some irregular fighters, and scholarship including Rogan's holds the Ottoman provincial governor, himself Muslim, responsible for failing to prevent or halt the violence; an international commission of inquiry and the Ottoman government's own later executions of implicated officials treated it as a grave crime rather than a legitimate religious act. This edge names the perpetrating mob's and the failing officials' religious identity as the historical sources give it; it is not an assertion that Islam as a religion caused the massacre, and mainstream Ottoman Islamic authority itself punished those responsible.
Belongs to Tradition
Christian communities were principal parties on both sides of this two-phase event: the Maronite Christian community of Mount Lebanon, per Fawaz's reconstruction, suffered the great majority of Mount Lebanon's dead and the destruction of hundreds of its villages and churches in the Druze-Maronite fighting, and Damascus's wider Christian population, chiefly Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholic, was the target of the July mob killing there, per Rogan's account. This edge records Christian communities' part in both phases exactly as the two historians give it; it is not an assertion that Christianity or any Christian church waged or organized either episode as a religious campaign.
Druze communities and militias of Mount Lebanon were the other principal party in the 1860 civil war, within a governing system that itself divided the territory along Druze and Christian lines; Fawaz records Druze casualties as real but far fewer than Maronite dead. This edge documents the Druze community's part in a political and military conflict exactly as the historical record gives it; it touches no Druze religious teaching, and no closed Druze doctrinal content is described or implied.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
What Was the Combined Death Toll of the 1860 Mount Lebanon and Damascus Massacres?
Fawaz's Mount Lebanon estimate and Rogan's Damascus estimate come from two separate archival reconstructions written thirty years apart, each focused on a different phase and place; no single study has combined them into one reconciled figure for the whole 1860 violence, and the much higher contemporary press and missionary claims that circulated at the time remain uncorrected in some popular accounts.
What would resolve this A study working from Ottoman provincial and central archives, European consular correspondence and the records of the 1860 international commission of inquiry, applying a consistent method across both Mount Lebanon and Damascus, to produce one combined, reconciled casualty estimate for the whole episode.
Ottoman and modern Middle Eastern historyLeila Tarazi Fawaz, An Occasion for War: Civil Conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.