Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Maya, Practical Detail Meeting an Unanswerable Mystery

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Maya, Practical Detail Meeting an Unanswerable Mystery

The Right Angle Cross of Maya is named for Gate 62 and Gate 61. Human Design reads Gate 62, from Hexagram 62, Small Preponderance, sitting in the Throat, as detail, the organising of facts and particulars into an order that can be spoken; and Gate 61, from Hexagram 61, Inner Truth, sitting in the Head, as the pressure to know the mystery behind existence, which the system holds cannot be satisfied by information. It belongs to the Right Angle family, the largest of the system's three, read as a personal destiny that answers mainly to the individual's own choices.

Its design half is Gate 42 and Gate 32. Gate 42 sits in the Sacral centre and is read as the energy to carry a process through to its natural end; it pairs with Gate 53 in the channel of Maturation. Gate 32 sits in the Spleen and is read as the instinct for what will last, and caution about change for its own sake; it pairs with Gate 54 in the channel of Transformation.

So a chart carrying this cross names facts while pressing after an unanswerable mystery on its surface, while beneath it an energy to finish answers to a caution about lasting. The name Maya, the Sanskrit word for illusion, marks the system's own reading that what the mind can name is not the whole of what is real. The same two gate pairs also form the cross's other three role arrangements. The hexagrams are ancient; grouping four of them into one personal cross is the modern system's own construction, dated to 1987.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
The Human Design System
Ra Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower), Human Design America, 1992View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.