Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

The cosmic struggle of good and evil

Cosmological Beliefs

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Zoroastrianism understands creation as the arena of a great cosmic struggle between good and evil. On one side stands Ahura Mazda, the wise lord, the one uncreated God, wholly good, source of light, truth, and order; against him works the destructive spirit, Angra Mainyu (Ahriman), the origin of falsehood, darkness, and death. The world and human life are caught up in their conflict. Central to the faith is that each person is a free moral agent whose choices, through good or evil thoughts, words, and deeds, actively aid one side or the other. Tradition holds that good is destined finally to triumph. The belief gives human moral effort cosmic significance.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Period
1500 BCE to 600 BCE 1
Mary Boyce's A History of Zoroastrianism, Brill, 1989, dates the Gathas, the hymns the tradition ascribes to Zarathushtra himself, by the archaic state of their Avestan language, which stands close enough to Vedic Sanskrit that the two can be cross-dated by the same comparative linguistic methods used to date the Rigveda, pointing to roughly 1500 to 1000 BCE. Boyce sets that linguistic dating against a separate, later tradition, followed by classical Greek writers, that places Zarathushtra centuries afterward, a reckoning with no comparable linguistic evidence behind it. Because both the cosmic struggle of good and evil and the ethical triad of good thoughts, good words and good deeds are taught within the Gathas themselves, the origin period of both teachings is exactly as uncertain as Zarathushtra's own date, and it moves between the two proposals with it.
Belief
Subject
The cosmos and creation 1
Category of Belief
Cosmological Beliefs 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Binding, without a formal definition 1Tradition: Zoroastrianism
The organising claim of the tradition
Learn More
The Struggle of Good and Evil

Zoroastrians affirm a cosmic struggle between good and evil. The supreme God, Ahura Mazda (the Wise Lord), is wholly good and the source of light, truth, and life; opposed to him stands the destructive spirit, Angra Mainyu (Ahriman), the origin of the lie, darkness, and death. The world is the arena of their conflict, in which every person, by their choices, takes a side. The tradition teaches that the struggle is not eternal in its outcome: good is destined to triumph, evil to be overcome, and creation to be renewed at the end (the frashokereti).

The doctrine's central text is Yasna 30.3-4 in the Gathas, where the two primal spirits are described choosing, from the beginning, between life and not-life, good and evil, a passage scholars of Zoroastrianism, including Mary Boyce and R. C. Zaehner, have debated at length over how strictly dualistic to read it. Some interpreters treat Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu as two independent, co-original powers, a stronger dualism; others, especially later Zoroastrian theology, read Angra Mainyu as ultimately a lesser, dependent force whose defeat is assured because Ahura Mazda alone is truly uncreated and supreme, a reading that keeps the tradition closer to a qualified monotheism, and the two interpretations continue to divide scholarly and traditional accounts of the religion's basic theological structure.

A Moral Dualism with a Good End

This ethical dualism gives Zoroastrian belief its strong moral seriousness: because the cosmos is contested, human choices genuinely matter, and each person's thoughts, words, and deeds add to the side of order or of chaos. The teaching, rooted in the Gathas attributed to Zarathushtra and elaborated in the later Avesta, is often noted for its influence on ideas of a final judgement, resurrection, and the victory of good found in later traditions. It distinguishes Zoroastrianism from both strict monism and any dualism in which evil is co-eternal and undefeated, since here the good God prevails.

One historical school within Zoroastrianism itself, Zurvanism, attempted to resolve the tension in the dualist scheme by positing Zurvan, Infinite Time, as a prior unifying principle from which both Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu were born as twin offspring, a myth attested in Sasanian-era sources and in reports by later Christian, Manichaean, and Islamic writers describing Zoroastrian belief they encountered. Zurvanism appears to have had real currency, particularly among the Sasanian priesthood, before the mainstream Zoroastrian tradition that survived into the modern period rejected it as heretical, so that the version of the good-evil struggle now taught by Zoroastrian communities represents the position that outlasted, rather than the only position ever held within, the tradition's own history.

In the Texts
Isaiah 45:5-7The Holy Bible, American Standard Versionthe oneness of God

I am Jehovah, and there is none else; besides me there is no God. I will gird thee, though thou hast not known me; that they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none besides me: I am Jehovah, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am Jehovah, that doeth all these things.

Denies the two-principle account of good and evil.

The Holy Bible, American Standard Version. translated by American Revision Committee.

About This Passage

Yasna 30.3 (Mills, SBE 31)The Zend-Avesta, Part III: the Yasna (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 31)good and evil

Thus are the primeval spirits who as a pair (combining their opposite strivings), and (yet each) independent in his action, have been famed (of old). (They are) a better thing, they two, and a worse, as to thought, as to word, and as to deed. And between these two let the wisely acting choose aright.

The scriptural root of the cosmic struggle.

The Zend-Avesta, Part III: the Yasna (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 31). translated by L. H. Mills.

About This Passage

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Passages on This

Isaiah 45:5-7, Passages

Denies the two-principle account of good and evil.

Yasna 30.3 (Mills, SBE 31), Passages

The scriptural root of the cosmic struggle.

Sources
1. A History of Zoroastrianism
Mary Boyce, Brill, 1989View the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
The Avesta
Anonymous (Zoroastrian tradition)View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.