Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

The Two Wills of Christ and the Monothelite Question

God and Divine Nature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 680 to 681 CE

The community formed around the monastery of Beit Maroun, associated with the Syriac hermit Saint Maron, who died around 410 CE. The Third Council of Constantinople, 680 to 681, condemned Monothelitism, the teaching that Christ possessed a single divine-human will, a position associated with attempts to reconcile Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian Christians in the seventh century Byzantine world. Whether the Maronite community was among those condemned, and held the position into the medieval period, versus having remained doctrinally orthodox throughout its geographic isolation, is a live historiographical dispute rather than a settled fact in either direction.

Facts
Disputed
Status Within the Tradition
Genuinely disputed within the tradition 3
Ronald G. Roberson's The Eastern Christian Churches: A Brief Survey (Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1999), a reference survey of the Eastern churches' individual histories, records that whether the historic Maronite community held the Monothelite position, that Christ has only one will, before its union with Rome, or remained doctrinally orthodox throughout its centuries of geographic isolation in Mount Lebanon, is a live historiographical dispute among historians of the Maronite church rather than a settled fact in either direction.
Point in Dispute
Whether the Maronite community was among those condemned and held the position into the medieval period, or remained doctrinally orthodox throughout its geographic isolation. The question is a live historiographical dispute rather than a settled fact in either direction. 3
Origins
Origin Period
680 to 681 CE 1
Held By
Whether Christ has two wills, divine and human, or one, was condemned as Monothelite heresy at the Third Council of Constantinople in 681 by Chalcedonian Christianity; whether the historic Maronite Church held the condemned position is itself disputed, since Maronite tradition insists it was always dyothelite. 2
Defining Moment
The Third Council of Constantinople, 680 to 681, condemned Monothelitism, the teaching that Christ possessed a single divine-human will. 1
Status
Doctrinal Category
God and Divine Nature 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Monothelitism was associated with seventh-century attempts to reconcile Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian Christians in the Byzantine world, by conceding a single will where the natures had already been defined as two. 1
Learn More
Saint Maron and a Church Formed Away from Imperial Councils

The community that became the Maronite Church traces itself to Saint Maron, a Syriac hermit monk who died around 410 CE and whose followers gathered into a monastic community at Beit Maroun in the region between Antioch and Aleppo. As the community migrated over subsequent centuries into the mountains of Mount Lebanon, seeking refuge from both Byzantine imperial pressure and later Arab conquest, it spent long stretches without a resident presence in the theological debates being settled at imperial councils in Constantinople, including the Third Council of Constantinople of 680 to 681, which condemned Monothelitism, the seventh century attempt, associated with Byzantine emperors seeking to reconcile Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian Christians, to teach that Christ possessed a single divine-human will rather than two distinct wills united in one person.

Maronite historiography dates a formal reunion with the Roman Catholic Church to the Crusader period, traditionally placed around 1182, an arrangement reaffirmed at the Council of Florence in 1445 and again, with reforms bringing Maronite practice closer to Roman norms, at the Synod of Mount Lebanon in 1736, while the church retained its own Syriac liturgical patrimony, the Maronite Rite, and a married parish clergy alongside celibate monastic orders.

What the Sources Do and Do Not Settle

The twelfth century Crusader chronicler William of Tyre reported that the Maronites formally renounced Monothelitism at the time of their reunion with Rome, a claim which, read at face value, implies the community had actually held that condemned position during its centuries of isolation. Maronite Patriarch Estephan Douaihy and the historiographical tradition that followed him rejected this account as either a misunderstanding on William's part or a piece of Latin polemical exaggeration meant to flatter the church's own role in correcting an erring community, insisting instead that the Maronites had remained doctrinally orthodox, holding two wills in Christ, throughout their isolation and had never actually taught the condemned position at all.

Modern historians, Matti Moosa's critical history of the Maronites among them, have examined the conflicting medieval evidence at length without reaching a conclusion that satisfies both sides of the dispute, since the strongest sources on each side are also the most obviously interested parties in the outcome. The honest state of the question is genuine disagreement between two named scholarly camps rather than a settled attribution in either direction, and the Maronite Church today affirms Christ's two wills, human and divine, as orthodox dyothelite doctrine in full communion with Rome regardless of how the historical question of its own seventh century practice is ultimately resolved.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

A doctrine held within Christianity.

Why this is disputed. Whether the historic Maronite community held Monothelitism before its union with Rome is disputed; Maronite tradition insists it was always dyothelite, while some historians read Crusader-era sources otherwise.

Source The Maronites in HistoryMatti Moosa
Sources
1. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine
Jaroslav Pelikan, University of Chicago Press, 1971View the Source
2. The Maronites in History
Matti Moosa, Syracuse University Press, 1986Moosa, The Maronites in History, on the Monothelite historiography
3. The Eastern Christian Churches: A Brief Survey
Ronald G. Roberson, Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1999View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.