Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Symbols

Latin Cross

Cross

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 300 to 400 CE

The upright crossed by a lower transverse bar is the commonest Christian sign, but it is not the earliest. For roughly two centuries Christians more often used the fish, the anchor, the dove and the chi-rho monogram, and the cross becomes a general devotional image only after Constantine legalised the religion in 313 and crucifixion ceased to be a Roman penalty. Images of Christ actually upon it are later again, rare before the fifth century. The form is Roman rather than Christian in origin, being execution furniture before it was anything else, and that is the point Christian writers press: an instrument of judicial humiliation is worn as an ornament because of what is claimed to have happened on one.

Facts
Form
Type of Symbol
Cross or crossed form 1
Geometric Form
An upright crossed by a single transverse bar set above the midpoint, so that the lower limb is the longest of the four. 1
Origins
Origin Period
300 to 400 CE 1
Place of Origin
The Roman Mediterranean. 1
Learn More
The Instrument, and the Reluctance to Show It

The Latin cross (crux immissa), upright with a lower limb longer than the other three, is the predominant Christian sign, but its dominance is not original. The earliest Christians were reluctant to depict the cross at all: crucifixion was a servile and shameful Roman penalty, and for the first two to three centuries believers more often used the fish, the anchor and the Chi-Rho monogram. The tau-rho staurogram appears as an abbreviation in New Testament papyri around the year 200. Public display of the cross followed Constantine's legalisation of Christianity and his abolition of crucifixion as a punishment in the fourth century. The crucifix, the cross bearing the body of Christ, is later still, becoming common only from roughly the sixth to tenth centuries; earlier crosses were bare or jewelled (crux gemmata), emphasising triumph rather than suffering.

The Alexamenos graffito, a piece of mocking graffiti scratched into Palatine Hill plaster and generally dated to the second or third century, shows a Christian worshipping a crucified, donkey-headed figure, evidence that outsiders already linked Christians to a crucified god well before the cross became a public devotional image. The staurogram, overlaying the Greek letters tau and rho so the tau's crossbar reads as outstretched arms, functioned as a pictogram of the crucifixion embedded in New Testament manuscript text centuries before free-standing crosses appeared, a transitional stage between avoiding the image and displaying it. Eusebius records Constantine's vision of a cross-shaped sign before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312, an episode later ages treated as the hinge toward the cross's emergence as a public emblem, though Eusebius wrote decades after the event and its details were already disputed in antiquity.

Latin, Greek, and a Proliferation of Forms

The Latin cross, with its long lower arm, is distinguished from the Greek cross of four equal arms, which dominates Byzantine usage and church ground plans. Many regional and confessional variants developed: the tau or T-cross associated with Anthony of Egypt and later the Franciscans; the Celtic ring cross; the Coptic, Jerusalem and Maltese crosses; and the Russian Orthodox cross with its slanted footrest. Medieval legend elaborated the wood itself, the Legend of the True Cross traced the timber to a tree grown from Adam's grave, and relics of the cross multiplied to the point that Erasmus and later Calvin remarked there was enough to build a ship. The empty cross favoured in most Protestant traditions and the crucifix of Catholic and Orthodox practice mark a real devotional difference over whether to stress the resurrection or the crucified Christ.

The proliferation of cross forms tracks Christianity's own fracturing and spread: the Coptic cross, often set with an ankh-like loop, reflects Egyptian Christianity's continuity with older Nile Valley visual habits; the eight-pointed Maltese cross became the badge of the Knights Hospitaller and later of Malta; and the Jerusalem cross, a large cross flanked by four smaller ones, was adopted by Crusader kingdoms and is read as representing Christ's wounds or the gospel's spread to the four corners of the earth. Heraldry multiplied the count further, with crosses fitchy, patonce, moline and bottony distinguished by the treatment of their arm ends, serving as identifying charges on coats of arms independent of theological content. The Reformation-era argument over bare cross versus crucifix made a real claim about where devotion should be directed, away from Christ's suffering body and toward the preached word, a dispute still visible in many Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox church interiors today.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

The Latin cross is the symbol the execution method became.

Belongs to Tradition

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Element Of

The Reformed churches keep the bare cross and refuse the figure on it, on the argument against images that runs through the Institutes. The distinction between an empty cross and a crucifix is the whole of the position.

Source Institutes of the Christian ReligionJohn Calvin

Held Differently

Eastern Orthodoxy, Denominations

The Byzantine cross carries an upper bar for the title and a slanted bar at the foot, and the sign is made from the right shoulder to the left. The form differs and the thing signified does not.

Source The Orthodox ChurchTimothy Ware (Kallistos Ware)

Rejected Here

Jehovah's Witnesses, Denominations

The Witnesses hold that Jesus died on an upright stake, and no cross appears on their halls, their literature or their persons. The refusal is doctrinal rather than a matter of taste.

Source Jehovah's Witnesses: Continuity and ChangeGeorge D. Chryssides

Latter-day Saints do not use the cross as an emblem, holding that a church should display the living Christ rather than the instrument of his death. Their buildings carry a spire and an angel instead.

Source An Introduction to MormonismDouglas J. Davies

Friends use no outward symbol at all. A meeting house carries no cross and no ornament, on the ground that the light is inward and needs no sign set up for it.

Symbol Continuity

Ankh, Religious Symbols

Why this is disputed. Comparison between the ancient Egyptian ankh and the Christian cross. Coptic Christians in Egypt adopted a cross form close to the ankh's silhouette, the crux ansata, and some scholars read this as a deliberate continuity, the ankh's ancient meaning of life recast in Christian terms; others hold the resemblance is coincidental, since the Latin cross's proportions follow the Roman execution instrument rather than any Egyptian model, and the crux ansata is one regional variant rather than the type itself.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Symbol Of

The Latin cross is the principal symbol of Christianity.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005Entry on the cross: early Christian use of the fish, anchor and chi-rho, and the spread of the cross after Constantine
Quote, Entry on the cross: early Christian use of the fish, anchor and chi-rho, and the spread of the cross after Constantine
The cross became a general Christian devotional image only after the legalisation of the religion in the fourth century; earlier Christian art preferred the fish, the anchor and the chi-rho monogram.
View the Source
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005s.v. CrossView the Source
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611Galatians 3:13; the Passion narrativesView the Source
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.