Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Islamic Studies

Humanities

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1889

Islamic doctrine and hadith tested against the documented history of when they actually entered the record, founded as a critical discipline by Ignac Goldziher's 1889 Muhammedanische Studien. Distinguishes early attested tradition from later material projected backward.

Facts
Method
Method
critical historical analysis of hadith transmission chains and early Islamic legal and theological texts, testing attributed sayings against the documented history of how they were transmitted 2
Subject
Subject
the historical formation of Islamic law, theology and hadith literature, and how later doctrine was attributed back to the Prophet and his companions 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Religious Studies 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1889 2
Learn More
Goldziher Tests the Chain of Transmission and Finds It Was Built Later

Islamic studies applies critical historical and philological method to the Quran, hadith and early Islamic legal and theological literature, asking when a given text or doctrine actually entered the record rather than accepting its own claimed chain of transmission at face value. The Hungarian orientalist Ignac Goldziher gave the discipline its foundational modern method in Muhammedanische Studien, whose first volume appeared in 1889, arguing through detailed textual analysis that a large body of hadith attributed to the Prophet Muhammad and his earliest companions had in fact been formulated later, during the legal and theological controversies of the first Islamic centuries, and then projected backward onto an earlier authoritative figure.

Goldziher's method, testing an attributed saying or doctrine against the documented history of when it actually appears in the surviving record rather than against the tradition it claims for itself, is exactly the standard the atlas applies wherever an Islamic doctrine, legal ruling or historical claim is described. The discipline lets the atlas distinguish an early and well attested element of Islamic tradition from a later development that later sources present as original, without adopting either an apologetic or a dismissive stance toward the tradition itself.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.