Origin from 1910
Classical Persian manuscripts collated against each other to establish which variant reading is most likely original. Founded in 1910, when Mohammad Qazvini's critical edition of Nezami Aruzi's Chahar Maqale, prepared for the Gibb Memorial Series, set the field's editorial standard by integrating European and Persian manuscript collation technique.
Facts
Method
Methodcollation of surviving Persian manuscript witnesses against each other, integrating Arabic and European editorial technique to establish which variant reading is most likely original 2 Subject
Subjectthe surviving manuscripts of classical Persian works, and which variant reading of a disputed passage is most likely the author's original text 2 Identity
Field Category Parent Field Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline Learn More
Qazvini Collates the Manuscripts and Persian Textual Criticism Gets Its Method
Persian textual criticism reconstructs the most reliable text of classical Persian works from their surviving manuscripts, establishing which variant reading of a disputed passage is most likely original rather than reprinting whichever copy happened to be most accessible. The Iranian scholar Mohammad Qazvini produced the field's founding critical edition, Nezami Aruzi's twelfth century Chahar Maqale, for the Gibb Memorial Series, dating his preface to 14 January 1910 and integrating European philological collation technique with the Arabic and Persian manuscript tradition's own editorial conventions to weigh variant readings systematically rather than by guesswork.
Qazvini's method, comparing every available manuscript witness against the others and giving explicit reasons for preferring one reading over another, set the editorial standard later Persian critical editions have followed. A classical Persian religious or Sufi text is frequently transmitted through manuscripts that disagree with each other in real and consequential ways, and Persian textual criticism is what the atlas relies on to establish which reading of a disputed line a scholarly edition actually supports, distinct from a popular printed text that silently follows one manuscript without explaining the choice.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Persians directly: "Classical Persian manuscripts collated against each other to establish which variant reading is most likely original."
Branch Of
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.