Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scriptures & Texts

Books of the Maccabees

books of the MAK-ah-beez
Deuterocanonical Books

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Not one book but four, by different authors in different languages for different purposes. 1 Maccabees is a sober chronicle written in Hebrew and surviving only in Greek, running from the persecution under Antiochus IV to about 134 BCE and openly committed to the Hasmonean house. 2 Maccabees is a Greek abridgement of a lost five-volume history by Jason of Cyrene, covering a shorter span with far more theology, the martyrdoms, and the passages on resurrection and prayer for the dead. 3 and 4 Maccabees are not about the revolt in the same sense at all. Catholic Bibles carry the first two, Orthodox canons carry more, and neither Jewish nor Protestant canons carry any.

Facts
Origins
Era of Composition
124 BCE to 100 BCE 1
Language
Biblical Hebrew 1
Language
Koine Greek 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Anonymous; 1 Maccabees by a Hasmonean-era historian c. 100 BCE, 2 Maccabees an epitome of Jason of Cyrene (critical) 1
Status
Canonical StatusSourced to the subject's own account
Deuterocanonical 2Tradition: Roman Catholicism
Canonical StatusSourced to the subject's own account
Deuterocanonical 3Tradition: Eastern Orthodoxy
Canonical Status
Non-canonical 1Tradition: Judaism
Text
Literary Form
Chronicle 1
Structure
Structure
1 Maccabees (16 chapters) and 2 Maccabees (15 chapters) 1
Structure
Histories of the Maccabean revolt 1
Learn More
Four Books, One Name, and Only Two About the Revolt

The shared name is a convenience rather than a description. 1 Maccabees was written in Hebrew, probably late in the second century BCE, and survives only in Greek translation. It narrates the persecution under Antiochus IV, the refusal of the priest Mattathias and his sons, the campaigns of Judas Maccabeus, the cleansing of the Temple, and the succession of Jonathan and Simon, closing as Simon's son John Hyrcanus takes power around 134 BCE. Its manner is that of the historical books of the Hebrew Bible: dated by Seleucid regnal years, sparing with the miraculous, and committed to the legitimacy of the Hasmonean house.

2 Maccabees was composed in Greek and is explicitly a condensation. Its author says he has boiled down the five books of Jason of Cyrene, a work otherwise entirely lost. It covers a shorter period, ends before Judas dies, overlaps 1 Maccabees rather than continuing it, and is written in an emotional rhetorical Greek full of heavenly apparitions and temple wonders. Two festal letters addressed to the Jews of Egypt stand at its head.

3 Maccabees has nothing to do with the revolt. It is a Greek novella about the Jews of Egypt threatened with mass execution by elephants under Ptolemy IV Philopator, decades before Antiochus, and delivered at the last moment. 4 Maccabees is not a narrative at all but a philosophical discourse, Stoic in vocabulary and thoroughly Jewish in commitment, arguing that devout reason is master of the passions and using the martyrs of 2 Maccabees, the aged Eleazar, the seven brothers and their mother, as its demonstration.

A Political History and a Theological One

The two books about the revolt read the same events differently, and the difference turned out to matter doctrinally. 1 Maccabees explains the victory politically and militarily. God does not intervene on stage; there is no angel in the sky, no resurrection, no afterlife worth the name. Deliverance comes through a family that fought, and the book's purpose is to establish that this family was the right one to rule and to hold the high priesthood, a contested claim rather than an obvious one, since the Hasmoneans did not belong to the line from which high priests had been drawn.

2 Maccabees is the reverse. Its centre is the martyrdoms: Eleazar the scribe refusing to eat pork or even to pretend to, and the seven brothers tortured to death one after another in front of their mother, each declaring as he dies that the King of the universe will raise them up to an everlasting renewal of life. This is among the clearest statements of bodily resurrection in Jewish literature before the New Testament, and it aligns with the Pharisaic position against the Sadducean one.

Two further passages carried great weight later. Judas is described taking up a collection and sending it to Jerusalem for a sin offering on behalf of soldiers who had died wearing forbidden amulets, with the comment that it is a holy and pious thought to pray for the dead. Judas is also shown a vision of the long-dead prophet Jeremiah praying for the people. Catholic theologians cited both for purgatory, for prayer for the dead and for the intercession of the saints; reformers who rejected those doctrines had a direct interest in rejecting the book, and said as much.

The Festival Is Jewish, the Books Are Not

The canonical position is untidy and worth stating exactly. Catholic Bibles contain 1 and 2 Maccabees, defined as canonical at Trent in 1546 and placed at the end of the historical books. The Eastern Orthodox churches receive 1, 2 and 3 Maccabees, and Greek Bibles commonly print 4 Maccabees in an appendix as valuable rather than canonical; the Georgian tradition has included all four. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo canon contains books called Meqabyan which share the name and almost nothing else, being different compositions rather than translations of these. Protestant Bibles class 1 and 2 Maccabees as Apocrypha, printed in Luther's Bible and in the King James version and absent from most later editions. Judaism includes none of them in the Tanakh.

That last point yields the sharpest fact about these books. Hanukkah is a Jewish festival, kept for eight days every year, commemorating the rededication of the Temple in 164 BCE, and the only substantial near-contemporary accounts of the events it commemorates sit in books that Judaism does not treat as scripture and that were preserved for two thousand years by Christians copying Greek manuscripts.

The rabbinic tradition tells the story by its own route, through a short passage in the Talmud about a single sealed cruse of oil that burned for eight days, a miracle neither Maccabean book mentions. 1 Maccabees accounts for the eight days quite differently, by reference to the festival of Booths the defenders had been unable to keep while the Temple was defiled. Festival and earliest history come down separate channels, and they do not quite meet.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

The Books of the Maccabees record the persecution under Antiochus IV and the revolt it provoked.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Held Differently

Anglican Communion, Denominations

Named in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, 1571, among the books the Church reads for example of life and instruction of manners but does not apply to establish any doctrine. Printed and appointed to be read, at a status deliberately short of the canon affirmed at Trent in 1546.

Source The Thirty-Nine Articles of ReligionChurch of Englandthe holders' own account
Anglicanism, Denominations

Named in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, 1571, among the books the Church of England reads for example of life and instruction of manners, but does not apply to establish doctrine, covering both First and Second Maccabees.

Source The Thirty-Nine Articles of ReligionChurch of Englandthe holders' own account
Church of England, Denominations

Named in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, 1571, among the books the Church reads for example of life and instruction of manners but does not apply to establish any doctrine. Printed and appointed to be read, at a status deliberately short of the canon affirmed at Trent in 1546.

Source The Thirty-Nine Articles of ReligionChurch of Englandthe holders' own account
Church of Ireland, Denominations

Named in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, 1571, among the books the Church reads for example of life and instruction of manners but does not apply to establish any doctrine. Printed and appointed to be read, at a status deliberately short of the canon affirmed at Trent in 1546.

Source The Thirty-Nine Articles of ReligionChurch of Englandthe holders' own account
The Episcopal Church, Denominations

Named in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles, 1571, among the books the Church reads for example of life and instruction of manners but does not apply to establish any doctrine. Printed and appointed to be read, at a status deliberately short of the canon affirmed at Trent in 1546.

Source The Thirty-Nine Articles of ReligionChurch of Englandthe holders' own account
Church of Sweden, Denominations

Not canonized, but retained. Luther gathered the deuterocanonical books into a separate Apocrypha section of his 1534 Bible, headed as not equal to Holy Scripture yet good and useful to read, and Lutheran Bibles have printed and read them there since.

Source An Introduction to the ApocryphaBruce M. Metzger

Not canonized, but retained. Luther gathered the deuterocanonical books into a separate Apocrypha section of his 1534 Bible, headed as not equal to Holy Scripture yet good and useful to read, and Lutheran Bibles have printed and read them there since.

Source An Introduction to the ApocryphaBruce M. Metzger
Lutheranism, Denominations

Lutheranism does not canonize Books of the Maccabees. Luther placed the deuterocanonical books in a separate section of his 1534 Bible as good and useful to read, but not equal to scripture.

Source An Introduction to the ApocryphaBruce M. Metzger

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account

Held as canonical scripture in the Eastern Orthodox Old Testament, affirmed at the Synod of Jerusalem, 1672, covering both First and Second Maccabees.

Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Judaism, Religions
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Source Canons and Decrees of the Council of TrentCouncil of Trentthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account

Declared canonical scripture for the Roman Catholic Church at the Council of Trent, Session IV, 1546, covering both First and Second Maccabees.

Source Canons and Decrees of the Council of TrentCouncil of Trentthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account
Source Canons and Decrees of the Council of TrentCouncil of Trentthe holders' own account
Source The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)Synod of Jerusalemthe holders' own account

Excluded from Canon

Anabaptism, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Baptist, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Calvinism (Reformed), Denominations
Source The Westminster Confession of FaithWestminster Assemblythe holders' own account
Church of Scotland, Denominations
Source The Westminster Confession of FaithWestminster Assemblythe holders' own account
Dutch Reformed Church, Denominations
Source The Belgic ConfessionGuido de Bres
Jehovah's Witnesses, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Pentecostalism, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Presbyterianism, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Protestantism, Denominations

The Protestant confessional consensus holds a thirty-nine-book Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, against the wider canon affirmed at Trent in 1546 and at Jerusalem in 1672. Lutheran and Anglican practice retains several of these books as edifying reading while denying them authority to establish doctrine.

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Seventh-day Adventism, Denominations

This tradition holds the standard thirty-nine-book Protestant Old Testament and does not canonize Books of the Maccabees, following the confessional consensus among Protestant bodies against the wider Trent and Synod of Jerusalem deuterocanon.

Found In

The Maccabees.

Related To

Sources
1. An Introduction to the Apocrypha
Bruce M. Metzger, Oxford University Press, 1957the books of the MaccabeesView the Source
2. Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent
Council of Trent, 15631-2 Maccabees affirmed at Trentthe holders' own accountView the Source
3. The Confession of Dositheus (Synod of Jerusalem, 1672)
Synod of Jerusalem, Eastern Orthodox Church, 1672Vol. I, on Critopulus' Confession and the canon
Quote, Vol. I, on Critopulus' Confession and the canon
mentions only twenty-two canonical books of the Old Test., and excludes from them the Apocrypha, mentioning Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Sirach, Baruch, and the Maccabees.
the holders' own accountView the Source
The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion
Church of England, 1571the holders' own accountView the Source
The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority
Lee Martin McDonald, Hendrickson, 2007View the Source
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 16111 and 2 MaccabeesView the Source
From the Maccabees to the Mishnah
Shaye J. D. Cohen, Westminster John Knox Press, 2006Book description
Quote, Book description
In this new edition of a best-selling classic, Shaye Cohen offers a thorough analysis of Judaism's development from the early years of the Roman Empire to the formative period of rabbinic Judaism.
View the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
The Belgic Confession
Guido de Bres, 1561Article 6
Quote, Article 6
We distinguish between these holy books and the apocryphal ones, which are the third and fourth books of Esdras; the books of Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Jesus Sirach, Baruch; what was added to the Story of Esther; the Song of the Three Children in the Furnace; the Story of Susannah; the Story of Bel and the Dragon; the Prayer of Manasseh; and the two books of Maccabees.
View the Source
The Westminster Confession of Faith
Westminster Assembly, 1646the holders' own accountView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.