Clive Ruggles is an archaeoastronomer, and this academic book, published by Yale University Press, critically examines claims about prehistoric British and Irish monuments such as Stonehenge having precise astronomical alignments, applying statistical rigor to distinguish genuine astronomical intent from coincidental alignment. Its strength is exactly that critical caution, Ruggles is explicit about which claimed alignments hold up to careful statistical testing and which popular claims about prehistoric astronomy do not, correcting a genre prone to overstatement. Its limit is that, because so much of the underlying evidence is necessarily inferential, working from stone positions rather than any surviving written record, even Ruggles's more careful conclusions remain interpretive rather than certain, a limit inherent to the evidence rather than to his method.
Facts
Citation
AuthorClive Ruggles
PublisherYale University Press
Publication Year1999
URLhttps://archive.org/details/astronomyinprehi0000rugg
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Clive Ruggles's scholarly survey, published by Yale University Press, of archaeoastronomy at prehistoric British and Irish monuments. NotesScholarly survey of archaeoastronomy at prehistoric British and Irish monuments.
Claims Backed By This Source (62 claims)
This source backs 62 claims across the atlas. As facts: 50 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 43 claims: 34 well-attested, 3 holds, 6 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Subcategories, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.