Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Indo-Tibetan Buddhism: Indian Buddhists and Their Tibetan Successors

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

David Snellgrove was a leading specialist in Tibetan and Indian Buddhist studies, and this is his major scholarly survey tracing how Buddhism actually transmitted from India into Tibet, working directly from the Indian Buddhist schools' own textual record to show how Tibetan tradition received, translated and transformed that material rather than treating Tibetan Buddhism as if it arose independently. That direct source based transmission history is the study's real evidentiary basis. Use it for established historical facts about the Indian textual and doctrinal roots of Tibetan Buddhism; a claim about a specific Tibetan school's own later, distinctively Tibetan development needs a source focused on that later period.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
David Snellgrove's major scholarly survey of the transmission of Buddhism from India to Tibet, covering the Indian Buddhist schools and how Tibetan tradition received and transformed them.
Notes
David Snellgrove's major scholarly survey of the transmission of Buddhism from India to Tibet, covering the Indian Buddhist schools and how Tibetan tradition received and transformed them. Use for established historical facts about the Indian roots of Tibetan Buddhism.
Citation
Author
David L. Snellgrove
Publisher
Serindia Publications
Publication Year
1987
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

India, Countries

This source names India directly: "a leading specialist in Tibetan and Indian Buddhist studies, and this is his major scholarly survey tracing how Buddhism actually transmitted from India into Tibet, working directly from the Indian..."

Claims Backed By This Source (137 claims)

This source backs 137 claims across the atlas. As facts: 87 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 13 holds, 7 connected. Plus 28 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 42 claims: 28 well-attested, 7 connected, 7 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 23 claims: 17 well-attested, 6 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 19 claims: 14 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Denominations, 14 claims: 6 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.
  • Practices, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 7 claims: 4 holds, 3 general references.
  • Disciplines, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Religious Organization & Structure, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Deities, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Practices

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.