Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Man, Myth and Magic

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Man, Myth and Magic is a popular illustrated encyclopedia of mythology, religion and the esoteric edited by Richard Cavendish with contributions from a range of named writers, and this record holds it at the tier appropriate to a broad general reference work rather than to specialist academic scholarship. Its value is its wide comparative coverage across traditions and topics, useful for orienting facts a specialist source can then confirm in depth, not for a claim needing close textual or historical precision on one narrow point. Use it for general, checkable facts about a broad range of mythological, religious or esoteric topics it covers; a claim needing rigorous scholarly sourcing on a specific point should be checked against a specialist academic source rather than resting on this encyclopedia alone.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
A broad illustrated reference encyclopedia surveying mythology, religion and the esoteric across traditions, edited by Richard Cavendish and issued by Marshall Cavendish from 1970; held at the tier for a maintained general reference rather than the top tier because its entries summarize a wide field rather than presenting original specialist scholarship.
Notes
Illustrated encyclopedia of mythology, religion and the esoteric; broad comparative coverage of occult and religious subjects.
Citation
Author
Richard Cavendish (ed.)
Publisher
Marshall Cavendish
Publication Year
1970
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man,_Myth_%26_Magic_(encyclopedia)
Source Type
encyclopedia
Claims Backed By This Source (110 claims)

This source backs 110 claims across the atlas. As facts: 48 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 40 holds, 1 connected. Plus 18 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Disciplines, 34 claims: 8 well-attested, 23 holds, 3 general references.
  • Figures, 29 claims: 18 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 6 holds, 2 general references.
  • Animals & Totems, 20 claims: 1 well-attested, 10 holds, 9 general references.
  • Articles, 16 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Mythical Creatures, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.

Scholarly debate

3
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.