Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Muntakhab al-Kalam fi Tafsir al-Ahlam (attributed to Ibn Sirin)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The dream manual that circulates under the name of Muhammad Ibn Sirin, an eighth century figure who left no attested dream book of his own, is in fact a later compilation, ascribed to al-Dari and dated to around the fifteenth century, first printed at Bulaq in 1284 AH. Its value is documented rather than assumed: it is cited here as a widely circulated attributed tradition, the popular Arabic dream manual readers actually encounter under Ibn Sirin's name, not as his authentic work. Its limit follows directly from that pseudepigraphic status: a claim about what the historical Ibn Sirin himself taught about dream interpretation cannot rest on this text, and any claim from it should be attributed to the later tradition rather than to Ibn Sirin.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
A later compilation only attributed to Muhammad Ibn Sirin, with contested authorship and no modern critical edition or publisher of record; the tradition's own primary text rather than independent scholarship, hence the tradition's-own-account tier.
Notes
The popular Arabic dream manual that circulates under Ibn Sirin's name is pseudepigraphic. Ibn Sirin (d. 110 AH / 728 CE) left no attested dream book; the received text quotes authorities who died long after him, among them al-Shafii (d. 204 AH) and al-Kirmani (d. 400 AH), and was compiled around the 15th c., first printed at Bulaq in 1284 AH. Cited here as an attributed tradition, not as the work of Ibn Sirin himself.
Citation
Author
Attributed to Muhammad Ibn Sirin (d. 728 CE); the received compilation is later, ascribed to al-Dari (15th c.)
Source Type
primary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)

This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Dream Symbols, 21 claims: 6 well-attested, 8 scholarly debate, 7 general references.
  • Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

8

General References

7
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.