Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Parsis (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on the Parsis, community-edited. Reliable for the standard account of their establishment of Bombay as the community's commercial and religious centre in the early eighteenth century, anchored to Rustom Maneck's 1702 appointment as the East India Company's first broker there and the 1728 founding of the Bombay Parsi Panchayet; explicit that the earlier migration from Persia to Gujarat itself has no settled date, naming three competing scholarly proposals, 716, 765 and 936 CE, rather than one, since its own foundational text, the Qissa-i Sanjan, was composed at least six centuries after the fact. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsis
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the well documented early eighteenth century Bombay establishment; the Sanjan migration's three competing dates, 716, 765 and 936 CE, are all named on the event's own entry rather than one being silently picked.
Notes
Used for the Parsi migration to Gujarat and the community's establishment of Bombay.
Connections

Associated With

India, Countries

This source names India directly: "Maneck's 1702 appointment as the East India Company's first broker there and the 1728 founding of the Bombay Parsi Panchayet; explicit that the earlier migration from Persia to Gujarat itself has no..."

Source Parsis (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)

This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Spread Events, 15 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 6 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Denominations, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Religions, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Religious Events, 1 claims: 1 holds.

Scholarly debate

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.