Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Augsburg Confession

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Augsburg Confession is Philipp Melanchthon's own primary text, the founding Lutheran confession presented to the Holy Roman Empire's Diet of Augsburg in 1530. As a primary confessional document it is authoritative for what the historical Confession itself states, the doctrinal position Lutheran reformers put forward at that specific moment, not for how any particular modern Lutheran body currently interprets or applies it, which is a separate and denomination-specific question needing its own source. Use it to establish the historical Confession's own wording and doctrinal claims as presented in 1530.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Philipp Melanchthon's own primary text, the founding Lutheran confession presented to the Diet of Augsburg in 1530; authoritative for what the historical confession itself states, not for how any modern Lutheran body currently interprets it.
Notes
The founding Lutheran confession, presented to the Diet of Augsburg.
Citation
Author
Philipp Melanchthon
Publication Year
1530
URL
https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc7/hcc7.ii.ix.iii.html
Source Type
primary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (167 claims)

This source backs 167 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested. As cited relationships: 58 holds, 6 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 60 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 71 claims: 5 well-attested, 30 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 31 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 29 claims: 14 well-attested, 7 holds, 8 general references.
  • Practices, 18 claims: 5 holds, 4 critiqued Here, 9 general references.
  • Denominations, 17 claims: 8 well-attested, 6 holds, 3 general references.
  • Rituals, 10 claims: 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Creeds & Confessions, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 6 claims: 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Held Differently

1

Doctrines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.