Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Old English Rune Poem: A Critical Edition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Maureen Halsall's critical edition works from the one surviving printed record of the Old English Rune Poem, since the manuscript itself, Cotton Otho B.x, was destroyed by fire in 1731 and the poem survives only through George Hickes's 1705 printing made before that loss. That the edition depends on a single, now-lost manuscript's sole surviving transcription is a real and stated limit on how confidently any specific reading can be checked against the original. Use it for the content of this specific rune poem, one of only three surviving rune poems and the only one known solely through a later printing rather than a surviving manuscript.

Facts
Citation
Author
Maureen Halsall
Publisher
University of Toronto Press
Publication Year
1981
URL
https://utorontopress.com/9781487592684/the-old-english-rune-poem/
Source Type
Critical edition
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A critical edition from a university press working from the one surviving printed record of the Old English Rune Poem, since the manuscript itself was destroyed by fire in 1731.
Notes
Critical edition with commentary. The Old English poem is one of only three rune poems, and the only one in a manuscript now lost (Cotton Otho B.x, burnt 1731); the text survives through George Hickes's 1705 printing.
Claims Backed By This Source (439 claims)

This source backs 439 claims across the atlas. As facts: 312 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 65 holds. Plus 58 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Anglo-Saxon Futhorc Runes, 283 claims: 187 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 63 holds, 29 general references.
  • Runes, 96 claims: 72 well-attested, 24 general references.
  • Articles, 37 claims: 36 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Languages, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

4

Anglo-Saxon Futhorc Runes

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.