Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Oviedo Cloth

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Mark Guscin is a classical scholar and translator based in Spain, and this Lutterworth Press book is the first English language study of the Sudarium of Oviedo, the cloth traditionally venerated as having covered Jesus's face at burial, examining its documented history, the EDICES research team's forensic studies of the bloodstains, and the radiocarbon dating result along with the objections raised against that result. Its strength is direct engagement with the actual scientific and historical evidence rather than devotional retelling alone, including presenting the radiocarbon caveats rather than omitting them. Its limit is that Guscin argues toward authenticity as his conclusion, reading the scientific evidence as confirming rather than contradicting the relic's traditional claim, so a reader wanting a fully independent, outcome neutral assessment should weigh this alongside sources with no stake in the relic's authenticity.

Facts
Citation
Author
Mark Guscin
Publisher
Lutterworth Press
Publication Year
1998
URL
https://www.worldcat.org/title/oviedo-cloth/oclc/40200909
Source Type
book
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Mark Guscin's monograph on the Sudarium of Oviedo, covering its history, the EDICES team's studies and the radiocarbon result along with its caveats; a popular rather than an academic press treatment.
Notes
Monograph on the Sudarium: history, the EDICES team studies, radiocarbon result and its caveats.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Spain, Countries

This source names Spain directly: "scholar and translator based in Spain, and this Lutterworth Press book is the first English language study of the Sudarium of Oviedo, the cloth traditionally venerated as having covered Jesus's face..."

Source The Oviedo ClothMark Guscin
Claims Backed By This Source (47 claims)

This source backs 47 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 open question. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 7 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 23 claims: 14 well-attested, 7 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Studies, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 open question, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Artifacts & Relics

Holds

3

Artifacts & Relics

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.