Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Roger Beck is a leading specialist in Roman Mithraism, and this study states its own central evidentiary limit honestly rather than presenting a false certainty: the Mithraic cult left no surviving scripture or creed of its own, so any account of its beliefs is necessarily a modern scholarly reconstruction built from surviving images, inscriptions and the astral symbolism of its ritual grades, not a documented statement of belief in the cult's own words. Beck's own interpretive framework, reading the imagery astrologically, is presented here as his scholarly reconstruction rather than as the cult's own confirmed doctrine. Use it for established archaeological and iconographic facts about Roman Mithraism and for Beck's own interpretive framework; treat any reconstructed belief as inference from images rather than as a documented creed.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Roger Beck's scholarly reconstruction of the Roman Mithras cult focused on its astral symbolism, published by Oxford University Press; the cult left no surviving scripture of its own, so any claim about its beliefs is necessarily a modern scholarly reconstruction, not a documented creed.
Notes
Roger Beck's scholarly reconstruction of the Roman cult of Mithras, focused on its astral symbolism and the cosmological meaning of its imagery and ritual grades. Use for established scholarly facts and Beck's own interpretive framework for Roman Mithraism; the cult left no surviving scripture of its own, so a claim about its beliefs is necessarily a modern scholarly reconstruction from images and inscriptions, not a documented creed.
Citation
Author
Roger Beck
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2006
URL
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-religion-of-the-mithras-cult-in-the-roman-empire-9780198140894
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (119 claims)

This source backs 119 claims across the atlas. As facts: 87 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 20 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 32 claims: 28 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 19 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 4 general references.
  • Deities, 15 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Prayers, 14 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 9 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Religions, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Sacred Architecture, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Bodies of Water, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.