Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon (Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Walter Burkert's 1962 study, later translated into English as Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, is the work generally credited with overturning the older popular image of Pythagoras as primarily a mathematician and establishing the now standard scholarly reading of him as a religious teacher whose circle mixed number symbolism, ritual purity and cosmology. Its track record is that this reading has held: it is the position later specialist treatments of Pythagoras still argue from or against, rather than one view among many with no particular standing. Its method rests on close philological work across the fragmentary and often late secondhand sources for early Pythagoreanism, which is also its limit, since firsthand Pythagorean writing barely survives and every reconstruction, including this one, is built from what later writers said about a much earlier figure. As with any single influential study now more than sixty years old, later scholarship has continued to refine points of detail, and a claim resting on the most current Pythagorean scholarship may need a newer source alongside it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Walter Burkert's landmark study from a university press that overturned the older popular image of Pythagoras as primarily a mathematician and established the scholarly reading of him as a religious teacher, the position later specialist work still argues from or against.
Notes
Cited as the origin of the consensus that Pythagoras was a religious teacher, not a mathematician, referenced here as "Burkert's 1962 study".
Citation
Author
Walter Burkert
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Publication Year
1962
URL
https://archive.org/details/lorescienceinanc0000burk
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (843 claims)

This source backs 843 claims across the atlas. As facts: 694 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 11 holds. Plus 135 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Numbers, 724 claims: 605 well-attested, 119 general references.
  • Doctrines, 30 claims: 17 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Articles, 29 claims: 28 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Prayers, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sacred Geometry, 10 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Esoteric Texts, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Categories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Numerology Positions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Religious Symbols, 1 claims: 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.