Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Artifacts & Relics

Leningrad Codex

Also Known As Codex Leningradensis (Latin) Latin script. The scholarly Latin name. · MS Firkovich B 19A (English) Latin script. Its shelfmark at the National Library of Russia. · Codex Petropolitanus (Latin) Latin script. Occasional name after St Petersburg (not to be confused with the Petersburg Codex of the Prophets).
Manuscripts

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible, written in Cairo and dated by its colophon to 1008 or 1009 CE. Copied by the scribe Samuel ben Jacob, who uniquely wrote the consonants, the vowels and the Masoretic notes himself, it belongs to the Ben Asher Tiberian tradition and is closely related to the Aleppo Codex. Because the Aleppo Codex is now incomplete, the Leningrad Codex serves as the base text for standard critical editions such as Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. It is held at the National Library of Russia in St Petersburg.

Facts
Identity
Distinction
Oldest complete manuscript of the entire Hebrew Bible 2
ScribeSourced to the subject's own account
Samuel ben Jacob (consonants, vowels and Masorah in one hand) 1
Physical Form
MaterialSourced to the subject's own account
Parchment, iron-gall ink, with sixteen illuminated carpet pages 1
Dating
Date AttributedSourced to the subject's own account
1008/1009 CE (per the manuscript colophon) 1
Custody and Display
Modern Role
Base text of Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and Biblia Hebraica Quinta 2
Learn More
Overview

The Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete manuscript of the entire Hebrew Bible, written in Cairo and dated by its own colophon to 1008 or 1009 CE. It belongs to the Tiberian Masoretic tradition of Aaron ben Asher and was copied by a single scribe, Samuel ben Jacob, who wrote the consonantal text, added the vowel-points and cantillation, and supplied the marginal Masoretic notes, an unusual concentration of the whole task in one hand that gives the book a remarkable internal consistency.

Its name comes from St Petersburg, which was called Leningrad through the Soviet period; the manuscript has been held there, in what is now the National Library of Russia, since the 19th century. Although the Aleppo Codex is somewhat older, its loss of most of the Torah left the Leningrad Codex as the oldest complete Masoretic Bible in existence. For that reason it was adopted as the base text of the Biblia Hebraica editions, the standard scholarly printings of the Hebrew Bible, and so stands behind a great deal of modern biblical study and translation.

History and Provenance

The codex was made in Fustat (Old Cairo) at the start of the 11th century. Its colophons record the scribe Samuel ben Jacob and state that the text was prepared and corrected from manuscripts pointed by Aaron ben Asher, tying it to the most authoritative branch of the Tiberian tradition. Beyond its text it is a fine object in its own right, with sixteen illuminated "carpet pages" of geometric ornament and micrography (patterns formed from minute writing).

Its modern history runs through the collection of Abraham Firkovich, a 19th-century Karaite scholar who gathered manuscripts across the Near East. His collection was acquired by the Imperial Public Library in St Petersburg, and the codex has remained there, through the city's renaming to Leningrad and back, as MS Firkovich B 19A, now in the National Library of Russia.

In the 20th century the manuscript acquired a new prominence. When Paul Kahle sought a complete, early Masoretic text as the base for the third edition of Rudolf Kittel's Biblia Hebraica, he chose the Leningrad Codex. It has served that role ever since, in Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and the in-progress Biblia Hebraica Quinta, and it was among the first major Hebrew manuscripts to be fully photographed and digitised, making the oldest complete Hebrew Bible freely consultable.

Authenticity and Scholarship

Unlike relics whose age must be inferred, the Leningrad Codex dates itself: its colophon gives the year of completion (variously computed as 1008 or 1009 CE by different eras of reckoning), and its script, vocalisation and Masoretic apparatus are entirely consistent with an early-11th-century Tiberian manuscript. Its authenticity is therefore not in dispute, and it functions as a fixed point against which other Masoretic witnesses are compared.

Scholarly discussion concerns its text rather than its genuineness. Because it was corrected toward the Ben Asher standard, it is very close to the Aleppo Codex, and where the two can be compared they agree in the overwhelming majority of details; the small divergences, and occasional scribal corrections visible in the Leningrad manuscript, are studied precisely because the book is the base of printed editions. Some scholars prefer the Aleppo Codex where it survives, treating Leningrad as the best complete substitute rather than the single most accurate witness. None of this touches the manuscript's date or integrity: it is a securely dated, complete and continuously housed book, which is what makes it so valuable as a reference text.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

The oldest complete Masoretic Hebrew Bible; base text of modern critical editions.

Belongs to Tradition

Housed At

Related To

A close Ben Asher Tiberian relative of the Aleppo Codex; completes what the Aleppo Codex now lacks.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd editionMichael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)

The Leningrad Codex, a principal witness.

Sources
1. National Library of Russia, Firkovich Collection, Leningrad Codex (MS Firkovich B 19A)
National Library of Russia, St Petersburg, 2020Firkovich Collection, MS B 19A; colophon date 1008/1009 CE.the holders' own accountView the Source
2. Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition
Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.), Macmillan Reference USA, 2007s.v. "Bible: Masoretic Text" / "Leningrad Codex".View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.