This reference was produced by Kokugakuin University's own Shinto studies program in Japan, the university most closely associated with Shinto scholarship, giving direct access to Japanese language scholarship on kami, shrines, rites and festivals in English summary form. That direct institutional connection to the tradition's own primary scholarly community, rather than a claim about general academic prestige, is the real basis for using it. This record has not independently traced a documented history of revisions across its edition. Use it for established facts about Shinto deities, shrines, rites and terminology.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
A reference encyclopedia produced by Kokugakuin University's own Shinto studies program in Japan, the university most closely associated with Shinto scholarship, giving direct access to Japanese language scholarship in English summary. NotesAcademic reference encyclopedia on Shinto produced by Kokugakuin University in Japan, covering deities (kami), shrines, rites, festivals and terminology. Use for established facts about Shinto belief, practice and institutions.
Citation
AuthorKokugakuin University
PublisherKokugakuin University
Publication Year2006
URLhttps://d-museum.kokugakuin.ac.jp/eos/
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Japan directly: "own Shinto studies program in Japan, the university most closely associated with Shinto scholarship, giving direct access to Japanese language scholarship on kami, shrines, rites and festivals in..."
Source Encyclopedia of Shinto (Shinto Jiten)Kokugakuin University
Claims Backed By This Source (388 claims)
This source backs 388 claims across the atlas. As facts: 230 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 51 holds, 11 connected. Plus 95 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 95 claims: 76 well-attested, 8 connected, 11 general references.
- Deities, 46 claims: 26 well-attested, 6 holds, 14 general references.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 38 claims: 16 well-attested, 7 holds, 15 general references.
- Rituals, 32 claims: 10 well-attested, 15 holds, 7 general references.
- Mythical Creatures, 23 claims: 15 well-attested, 1 holds, 7 general references.
- Religious Offices, 18 claims: 12 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
- Mantras, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Religious Organization & Structure, 13 claims: 8 well-attested, 5 general references.
- Sacred Sound, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Realms, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Denominations, 11 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 connected, 3 general references.
- Other Writings, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Architecture, 9 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Sacred Sites, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 5 claims: 2 holds, 3 general references.
- Practices, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 4 claims: 4 general references.
- Sacred Foods, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Religions, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Artifacts & Relics, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 2 claims: 2 general references.
- Animals & Totems, 1 claims: 1 holds.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Bodies of Water, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
230Showing 1 to 50 of 104 entities carrying this claim.
Holds
51Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
95Showing 1 to 50 of 90 entities carrying this claim.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.