Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Introductiones apotelesmaticae elegantes in chyromantiam, physiognomiam, astrologiam naturalem, complexiones hominum, naturas planetarum

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a sixteenth century printed manual on chiromancy and physiognomy by Johannes ab Indagine, a German clergyman, printed by Johannes Schott in Strasbourg in 1522. It belongs to the same genre as other early modern hand reading and face reading manuals, a practitioner setting out his own system of correspondences between bodily signs and character or fate, presented as established knowledge rather than as a claim he argues for. Its value to the atlas is as a primary record of what educated Renaissance Europe believed chiromancy and physiognomy could tell you, not as evidence that the system describes anything real. It carries no external verification of its claims, no revisions correcting earlier editions, and no modern editorial apparatus attached to this printing, so any reading of it here should be understood as reporting the source's own claims, not endorsing them.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
An early modern practitioner's own manual of chiromantic and physiognomic correspondences, printed without outside verification, cited here as the tradition's own account rather than as independent evidence, in line with how this register holds works of the same kind.
Notes
Primary text. One of the earliest printed chiromantic manuals, and the one in which the planetary rulership of the mounts of the palm is already fully set out alongside physiognomy and natural astrology. Evidence for the 1522 layer and for the astrological derivation of the mount names.
Citation
Author
Johannes ab Indagine (Johannes Rosenbach)
Publisher
Johannes Schott, Strasbourg
Publication Year
1522
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Europe, Continents

This source names Europe directly: "record of what educated Renaissance Europe believed chiromancy and physiognomy could tell you, not as evidence that the system describes anything real."

Claims Backed By This Source (91 claims)

This source backs 91 claims across the atlas. As facts: 73 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 15 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Palm Mounts, 43 claims: 34 well-attested, 9 general references.
  • Articles, 22 claims: 21 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Fingers, 18 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.

Scholarly debate

2

Fingers

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.