Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

An Introduction to English Runes

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

R. I. Page's introduction is notably skeptical of claims for runic magic and divination, and his own chapter addressing that question directly, distinguishing attested epigraphic use of runes from later modern occult use, is the standard scholarly point of reference other runologists cite on exactly that distinction. That named, specific scholarly contribution, not a claim about its press, is the real basis for its standing here. This is a second, revised edition. Use it for the historical form and attested use of runic writing and for the documented distinction between ancient epigraphic use and modern occult reinterpretation.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A standard scholarly introduction from an academic press, its author notably skeptical of claims for runic magic and divination, with a chapter on that question that other runologists cite as the usual point of reference.
Notes
Second edition. The standard English-language introduction. Page is notably sceptical of claims for runic magic and divination, and his chapter on the subject is the usual scholarly point of reference for the distinction between attested epigraphic use and modern occult use.
Citation
Author
R. I. Page
Publisher
Boydell Press
Publication Year
1999
URL
https://archive.org/details/introductiontoen0000page
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (318 claims)

This source backs 318 claims across the atlas. As facts: 205 well-attested. As cited relationships: 52 holds. Plus 61 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Anglo-Saxon Futhorc Runes, 238 claims: 157 well-attested, 52 holds, 29 general references.
  • Articles, 43 claims: 39 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Runes, 24 claims: 24 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Categories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 2 claims: 2 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.