J. Lorand Matory's study is a scholarly ethnographic and historical study of Candomble, the Afro-Brazilian religion, built from documented fieldwork and archival research specifically focused on its transnational ties to West Africa and the role of women in its priesthood, rather than describing Candomble as a generic Afro-diasporic tradition. That named, focused method is the study's real evidentiary basis. Use it for established facts about Candomble as documented in this specific study, particularly its transnationalism and its priesthood's gender structure; it is not a general reference on Afro-diasporic religion beyond Candomble specifically, so a claim about a related tradition such as Santeria or Vodou needs a source dedicated to that separate tradition.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
J. Lorand Matory's scholarly ethnographic and historical study of Candomble built from documented fieldwork and archival research specifically focused on its transnational ties to West Africa and the role of women in its priesthood. NotesScholarly ethnographic and historical study of Candomble, the Afro-Brazilian religion, focused on its transnational ties to West Africa and the role of women in its priesthood. Use for established facts about Candomble as documented in this specific study; not a general reference on Afro-diasporic religion beyond Candomble.
Citation
AuthorJ. Lorand Matory
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2005
URLhttps://archive.org/details/blackatlanticrel0000mato
Source Typebook
Connections
Associated With
This source names Africa directly: "on its transnational ties to West Africa and the role of women in its priesthood, rather than describing Candomble as a generic Afro-diasporic tradition."
Source Black Atlantic Religion: Tradition, Transnationalism, and Matriarchy in the Afro-Brazilian CandombleJ. Lorand Matory
Claims Backed By This Source (178 claims)
This source backs 178 claims across the atlas. As facts: 114 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 23 holds, 1 connected. Plus 39 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 36 claims: 17 well-attested, 1 holds, 18 general references.
- Subcategories, 30 claims: 22 well-attested, 3 holds, 5 general references.
- Religious Organization & Structure, 24 claims: 14 well-attested, 7 holds, 3 general references.
- Articles, 22 claims: 22 well-attested.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 13 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 connected, 4 general references.
- Religions, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Sites, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Bodies of Water, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Cities, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Prayers, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Practices, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Language Families, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
114Religious Organization & Structure
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Showing 1 to 50 of 57 entities carrying this claim.
Holds
23Religious Organization & Structure
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
39Religious Organization & Structure
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.