Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Religion of the Nabataeans: A Conspectus

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

John Healey's study is the standard critical survey of Nabataean religion, and its real evidentiary basis is stated in its own method: it works from the Nabataean Aramaic inscriptions, the surviving iconography and the archaeology directly, rather than relying on Greek literary report about the Nabataeans at second hand. That grounding in primary epigraphic and archaeological material, checkable against the inscriptions themselves, is why it functions as the standard reference despite the comparatively small and specialized field it covers. The corpus held no dedicated authority on Nabataean religion at any tier before this source was added. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Healey's specific readings since 2001. Use it for established facts about Nabataean religion and its deities; a claim resting on a single inscription's own disputed reading needs the epigraphic literature addressed directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
John Healey's standard critical scholarly survey of Nabataean religion, worked from the Nabataean Aramaic inscriptions, iconography and archaeology rather than Greek literary report alone, published by Brill.
Notes
Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 136. The standard critical survey of Nabataean religion, worked from the Nabataean Aramaic inscriptions, the iconography and the archaeology rather than from Greek literary report alone. The corpus held no authority on Nabataean religion at any tier before this row.
Citation
Author
John F. Healey
Publisher
Brill
Publication Year
2001
URL
https://archive.org/details/religionofnabata0000heal
Source Type
Monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Nabataeans, Cultures

This source names Nabataeans directly: "on Greek literary report about the Nabataeans at second hand."

Claims Backed By This Source (124 claims)

This source backs 124 claims across the atlas. As facts: 69 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 17 holds. Plus 37 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Alphabet Letters, 56 claims: 28 well-attested, 28 general references.
  • Deities, 16 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 6 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 14 claims: 8 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Pantheons, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Subcategories, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Screen Works, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Deities

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.