Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism

This dictionary was compiled by scholars working across the Buddhist traditions of South, Southeast, East and Central Asia specifically so that a single reference could define terms consistently across regions that are more often treated separately, which is a genuine editorial undertaking rather than a claim resting on its press. This record has not independently traced a documented history of corrections across its printings. It is a strong source for defining Buddhist terminology and identifying schools, including the named division into Theravada monastic lineages this atlas has drawn from it. It summarizes a field rather than arguing a position, so a live scholarly dispute about a specific school or text may need a more specialized study alongside it.

Facts
Citation
Author
Robert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Publication Year
2014
URL
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157863/the-princeton-dictionary-of-buddhism
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A single volume scholarly dictionary from a university press, written by two leading specialists in Buddhist studies, the standard current academic reference across Buddhist schools and traditions.
Notes
Authoritative reference; added for Theravada nikayas, 2026-07-22.
Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "of South, Southeast, East and Central Asia specifically so that a single reference could define terms consistently across regions that are more often treated separately, which is a genuine editorial..."

Source The Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.

This source names Theravada directly: "including the named division into Theravada monastic lineages this atlas has drawn from it."

Source The Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.
Claims Backed By This Source (3,858 claims)

This source backs 3,858 claims across the atlas. As facts: 2,582 well-attested, 27 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 581 holds, 73 connected, 4 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 24 held Differently. Plus 563 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 714 claims: 586 well-attested, 3 holds, 58 connected, 67 general references.
  • Denominations, 524 claims: 285 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 179 holds, 7 connected, 2 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 22 held Differently, 23 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 375 claims: 254 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 64 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 54 general references.
  • Deities, 359 claims: 277 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 30 holds, 50 general references.
  • Figures, 332 claims: 260 well-attested, 9 scholarly debate, 31 holds, 32 general references.
  • Alphabet Letters, 229 claims: 87 well-attested, 60 holds, 82 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 171 claims: 118 well-attested, 35 holds, 18 general references.
  • Virtues, 119 claims: 79 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 16 holds, 6 connected, 14 general references.
  • Doctrines, 111 claims: 41 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 36 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 2 held Differently, 30 general references.
  • Practices, 100 claims: 79 well-attested, 10 holds, 11 general references.
  • Mantras, 84 claims: 69 well-attested, 5 holds, 10 general references.
  • Religious Offices, 68 claims: 43 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 17 holds, 7 general references.
  • Rituals, 66 claims: 38 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 16 holds, 11 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 60 claims: 37 well-attested, 9 holds, 14 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 59 claims: 40 well-attested, 9 holds, 10 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 49 claims: 32 well-attested, 6 holds, 11 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 45 claims: 16 well-attested, 29 general references.
  • Holidays & Festivals, 43 claims: 29 well-attested, 5 holds, 9 general references.
  • Mudras, 42 claims: 32 well-attested, 10 general references.
  • Organizations, 40 claims: 24 well-attested, 5 holds, 11 general references.
  • Other Writings, 31 claims: 21 well-attested, 7 holds, 3 general references.
  • Vices, 30 claims: 23 well-attested, 2 holds, 5 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 23 claims: 12 well-attested, 2 holds, 9 general references.
  • Observance Rules, 22 claims: 12 well-attested, 6 holds, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sacred Architecture, 18 claims: 4 well-attested, 7 holds, 7 general references.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 18 claims: 14 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Subcategories, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Pilgrimage Routes, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Categories, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Godai (Five Elements), 10 claims: 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Directions, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Scholarly Disciplines, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Calendars, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Councils and Synods, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Religious Dress & Vestments, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scripture Portions, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Spread Events, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Mythical Creatures, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Animals & Totems, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Prayers, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.

Open question

1

Historical Figures

Critiqued Here

4

Denominations

Historical Figures

Rejected Here

3
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.